The Young James Bond book, Blood Fever, is about the
adventure of young James Bond and because so much is happening and there are
two storylines. I believe the author picked 3rd person limited so
that the reader could fully visualize the 2 story lines while
foreshadowing and making the reader make predictions easily
without knowing too much and luring them into the metaphorical spiders web of a
story.
I believe this is true
because when James was exploring in the Giants tombs the narrator told how
James was feeling and what he thought whilst he didn’t say: “Little did James
know that the dehydration was just about to take over,” That would have made the
story 3rd person omniscient or:
Cooper ffrench called out my name,
and the sound seemed to pop and spin in to space with the noise like a
firework.
I tipped foreword feeling the
dehydration take over
And I was falling, down, down, down
into that black abyss
which would make it 1st
person.
No, the narrator said:
Cooper-ffrench called out his name, and the sound seemed to pop and
spin into space with the noise like a firework.
James tipped foreword.
And he was falling, down, down, down
into that black abyss …
I also believe that 3rd person limited is good for this story because it makes the reader(or just me) see this
story like I’m there but I’m not there and that is a good feeling.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for Commenting